Category Archives: Radar Opinion

Opinion: Did People Mag Prince article go too far? Or not far enough?

(This opinion must be prefaced by what is a known fact about Prince fans – they are a very loving group and try to abide by his example of loving one another. However, they are fiercely protective of his image and will let it be known that the tarnishing of his image, his reputation, and his legacy will not be tolerated.)

The recent article published by People magazine has unleashed a torrent of tweets and Facebook posts in which they are rising to his defense or to the defense of his ex-wife.The article purports to be an interview with Mayte Garcia, one of the ex-wives of Prince. However, the asides and editorializing of her comments, appear to be efforts to produce sensationalism where there is none. And that leads to the questions: Did the writers of  the article go to far? Or not far enough?

A review of excerpts from the article reveal that the answer to both questions is yes. Seemingly, these two writers used a fill-in-the-blank approach to their writing of this article. Twisting the words of Ms. Garcia via attaching their own assumptions to her words.

The first thing that is completely unfair and biased to both Prince and Ms. Garcia is the characterization of events which occurred subsequent to the death of their son. The authors use the word “dragged” when describing Prince’s efforts to get her to join him in the Oprah interview.They seem to ignore that he was the child’s father, who was also grieving, but trying to move forward. Sure she described what happened, but there was nothing to indicate that she was “dragged” out of bed. If anything, she was being pulled away from her grief, but so was he. And, Ms. Garcia was quoted in years past saying that they wanted to show that they were strong, indicated that the decision to do the Oprah interview was mutual: (See link to Hollywood life article below)

           “We had to show people that we were strong,that we had faith,and that we would try again.”

-Mayte Garcia-

(This writer, who also had a child to die, can state in hindsight that there is a lingering wish to have been pulled away from the grief-filled bed instead of being allowed to lay there for months.)  The writers clearly attempt to twist the story and bend it against Prince instead of towards a grieving couple. Had they done any research, they would have known that couples seldom know exactly what to do  and an attempt to pull their spouse out of the grief with an activity is an act of love, and not an act of malice.

The next glaring omission by the writers is that they apparently failed to mention his severe and chronic hip pain, and his need for a second hip surgery. Injured by many years of jumping from high places while performing … in heels, and all of his acrobatic dances on stage, including splits. Many while holding his guitar. So instead of acknowledging his chronic and severe pain, the writers infer and imply that Prince was using some sort of drug for no reason. Were the ‘drugs’ painkillers? Not far enough.

The inference and interpretations go even further, when they state, and not as a quote, that people had “no idea he was battling drug addiction”. But they offer no proof that there was any such “battle”. In fact, his cause of death states he died from an “accidental” overdose from a painkiller. The other fact is that Ms. Garcia states that she never saw him do “anything”, yet the writers move that statement to a ‘battle’ with ‘drug addiction’.  Too far.

When Ms. Garcia states he had to have his stomach pumped, the writers insert the word “claimed” as if to infer that he was lying when stating the reason having been the mixing wine and aspirin.

And, it gets worse. When a person says that they are “sick” or that they have a “migraine” does not “hint” at drug addiction. Pretty low bar.    

Prince was a devout Jehovah’s Witness, yet the writers describe his spiritual path as a “retreat”, applying which could be interpreted by some as being negative and unreal. Did the writers interview his church members? Or Larry Graham? If the answer is no, then what gives them license to label his acceptance of his chosen faith as a “retreat”? Nothing. Too far.

And then there is the meeting of Prince and Mayte. Again the writers did not go far enough, for they infer and imply that Prince merely “met” or saw Mayte and aggressively pursued her when she was but sixteen years old. However, they fail to add that he was first introduced to him via her mother who sent him a video of her belly-dancing. ( Suggestive much?) Mayte’s mother then allowed her 16-year-old daughter to go to Minnesota where she stayed until they were married a few years later! But  Mayte has repeatedly stated in interviews that Prince never made any sort of advances towards her until she was 18 years old and qualifies that statement with her words that he was “very respectful” towards her and never did anything that was untoward. (See link to article below)

The writing technique of these writers is irresponsible, but as only another writer can recognize it, it is seldom called out by the readers. Intermingling quotes with their own inferences,opinions, and makes it clear that the article needed something to spice it up  and they apparently shamelessly employed those techniques which  lead the average reader  attribute all that is written within to Mayte Garcia instead of themselves.

Who is most hurt by this? Prince, first and foremost, and of course his friends and fans who know better, but also Ms. Garcia who had her actual words editorialized by writers to make it appear as if she said something which she did not. That sort of  literary shading is harmful to all parties and all readers.

These are a couple of facts that all should read, accept, and then move forward to protecting his legacy from these sort of sensationalist publications. Prince married Mayte. He loved her. They lost two children. They broke up. Then he didn’t love her. Relationships end and “tell-all” books never tell the entire story, especially when one of the subjects is no longer around to contribute to that story. Mayte has been diagnosed with Multiple sclerosis  but even she knows,in her heart of hearts, if Prince were alive, he would help her financially with the medical bills. He was a kind and giving soul, and according to those closest to him, even Mayte, there is no indication that he was addicted to drugs. 

And lastly, if he was taking painkillers, he was doing so when he was not in optimum health. It can be assumed that he was grieving the passing of Vanity, and even his own personal chef has stated that his appetite decreased. In fact, he did not even eat the last meal prepared for him. That is what grief will do to you. Taking a painkiller on an empty stomach is never advised. And, in this way, in addition to going to far, the writers did not go far enough to provide readers with sufficient background to provide a fair picture of Prince Rogers Nelson. And that is irresponsible and sensationalized journalism. Prince fans should blame the writers for their inserted messages into this article and do what they can to protect his image from being tarnished. Just be certain that the blame for doing so is placed upon the proper shoulders.

Prince & Mayte Garcia: The Tragic Loss Of Their 2nd Baby Broke Up Their Marriage

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4317660/Prince-wooed-ex-wife-Mayte-Garcia-16-sex-19.html

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/1139327/princes-ex-wife-mayte-garcia-reveals-how-she-will-always-love-the-star-after-their-amazing-and-bizarre-romance-despite-tragedy-of-babys-death/

Leave a comment

Filed under Music, Opinion, Radar Opinion

Opinion: Note To Millennials-Why Hillary Is Admired

hillary-2

 

It is hope that this explanation and admonition is not received as a condescending lecture to young people, but rather as an insightful retrospective regarding Hillary Clinton. For, although history can be recited to you via historians and pundits, her enemies and foes, and her friends, there is nothing quite the same as a view from the cheap seats. The seats in which regular persons sat from afar and formed not only opinions, but loyalty to Hillary Clinton. So this begins at not quite the beginning, but a beginning of which you, and perhaps even your parents, were not even yet born. A beginning which stretched over decades, that you can not understand unless you yourself were part of it.

hillary-bill-young

For those who watched history when the Nixon impeachment investigation commenced, the daily news was filled with a cast of players, whose names became either famous or infamous. There was one player, whose name did not become a household one during that time. But, nevertheless, that person had a key role – one of the attorneys for the committee, assigned to research, review and investigate for that committee. That person, was Hillary. The results of the findings of that committee, based up the work of those attorneys, led to the resignation of Richard Nixon, and the conviction and imprisonment of many others. And, although the general public did not know her, those Republicans in power did, and like the elephant which is the symbol of their party, they remembered and did not forget her role. It would be forever remembered as Watergate and for many it was the historical event of a lifetime. For Republicans, it was the defeat of a lifetime, and they took names, and Hillary’s name was on that list.

Fast forward to when Hillary Rodham  became First Lady of Arkansas. She was criticized for gender based strength. And, during a time when it was unheard of, she refused to relinquish her own surname. But not only her surname, but her profession. She was a brilliant attorney, and was determined to not let go of her vocation. She was of that new generation of women which refused to be placed in the boxes and roles to which their parents had been forced to conform. She continued her work on behalf of children and families. But apparently, it was too much for the aged powers that be and a community which did not want to move too fast, and wanted their governor and first lady to remain recognizable to the past from which they all came. So, Bill Clinton lost his re-election bid. Knowing how much it meant to her husband, Hillary dropped her surname and became “Mrs. Clinton”, but she did not take a back seat, she managed his campaign, and he won.

Fast forward, Bill Clinton was running for president. Suddenly, a woman with whom he had a long-term affair came out of the shadows to disparage him to the press. But it was Hillary who sat beside him during an interview and said if you don’t like him then don’t vote for him, and, saying without saying it, if I can handle it, then so can you. In fact, so must you.  Asserting that she was not channeling Tammy Wynette, (stand by your man), but was stating her belief that he was the best man for the job. Bill Clinton won the election.hillary-young-3

The press continued to try to pigeon-hole Hillary into that ‘female’ box and challenged her about not wanting to have ‘teas’ and “bake cookies”.  Thus, when she actually had the press served cookies, most took it as tongue-in-cheek. Her appearance was criticized, there were even stories about her eyebrows.  And she was given such a hard time that there were signs made saying “Don’t pillory Hillary.”  But her arrival in Washington refreshed the memories of those elephants and she never really had a chance. There was no ‘let bygones be bygones’. When she presented her healthcare package to Congress, she was not given a fair chance. Her demeanor was not that of today, because she was learning, the hard way, that it was not about fairness, substance, or her capability – it was about her role. A role which the mostly male congress defined for her. First lady – chief ‘smiler’ and hostess with appropriate eyebrows. Those in the cheap seats saw and learned right along with her. She lost that fight, but with the public – score one for Hillary Clinton.

There were all sorts of fake scandals including one called ‘travelgate’. Fueled by press that wanted to be the next Berstien and  Woodward. But there was no there there. Score another for Hillary Clinton with the public.

And there was the courageous Hillary, again refusing to be put into that box, who, as First Lady traveled to China for an international women’s congress. Her speech was read by President Bill Clinton’s staff and advisers. They advised that she not attend. That she not say what was in her speech. But there, on China’s soil, challenged the abysmal human rights record of China towards its women, and  in that speech, she coined the phrase: “Women’s rights, are human rights.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXM4E23Efvk   And there it was, Hillary on the world stage, using her pulpit to call out China … on their own soil. The women of the world cheered her, because, again, it was during a period of time when women were expected to ‘behave appropriately’ and to remember their place. To be nice ladies. Hillary stood her ground and it was yet another milestone for women everywhere.

But then all hell broke loose with the Monica Lewinski scandal, fueled by the Republicans and their players, to take down a popular president and his wife. Watergate would be avenged. But it didn’t work out that way.Because Hillary did not believe it to be true. She had seen so many attempts by the Republicans, she could only believe that this was yet another one, and, on live television, she called it a “vast right-wing conspiracy“.  And looking back, one can clearly see with the benefit of hindsight, Bill Clinton was not lying to America when he denied the consensual affair, he was denying

President Clinton, his daughter Chelsea, center, and wife Hillary Rodham Clinton walk from the White House toward a helicopter as they depart for vacation Tuesday, Aug. 18, 1998. The first family will travel to Martha's Vineyard, Mass. for a two week vacation. Late Monday night, the president confessed to a relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky following an afternoon of testimony before the independent counsel's grand jury. (AP Photo/Roberto Borea)

President Clinton, Chelsea, Hillary Tuesday, Aug. 18, 1998. Late Monday night, the president confessed to a relationship with a White House intern

it to Hillary. She was his audience. But soon, it was revealed that the allegation was true. And the next morning after he publicly admitted it, the despair could be seen with Chelsea walking in between the two of them, holding their hands. Hillary not looking at the press, but clearly putting one step in front of the other. But still walking with her family. Scone yet another for Hillary Clinton. Because everyone knew that she had believed him, as did many of his close

friends within his administration. They were publicly disappointed, and said so, for they, as did Hillary, had come to his defense. So if they were disappointed, any person could see and know that she was heartbroken.

Fast forward to the Republican led impeachment of Bill Clinton. Unlike Nixon, he did not resign.  And on that day, the look on her face, trying to appear brave, walking beside her husband, told the story. She, like many others knew that he did not deserve that. And many of those who had led the impeachment, had their own tales of infidelity come to light, including Newt Gingrinch. But Hillary weathered it, stood by Bill, and he was acquitted in the senate. It was over. And all eyes were on Hillary. She did not budge from Bill’s side, even after he left office. She stayed and there it was – love and loyalty – score another for hillary-on-day-of-bills-impeachmentHillary with the general public. And with Ken Starr as special prosecutor with wide-sweeping powers, there was the onslaught of investigations, Whitewater, and too many to name. There was the right-wing hit squad which calls itself ‘Judicial Watch’ with their bombardment of civil lawsuits, merely to get them under oath or to obtain documents. Ken Starr admitted that there was no there there after millions and millions of dollars, grand juries.   http://www.cbsnews.com/news/whitewater-case-closed/

She ran for senate and won.She refused to not achieve her own personal potential. She won and was re-elected to the same office by even a larger margin.

Fast forward to her tenure as secretary of state, and the praise which was heaped upon her from both sides of the aisle … until the whispers of a possible presidential run began to circulate. After she left that office, suddenly there were investigations over the deaths of four Americans in Libya. Even though that was probably the smallest number to die during an attack upon what was not even an embassy, but a consulate, the Republican led congress decided that they wanted to build a cross upon which they could nail Hillary. But the public who had watched her through the years, remembered, and did the math themselves. They had seen her under attack so many times, and they were at it again.Unabashedly partisan, those congresspersons, had her go before congress over and over again. The final time was for 11 hours. But this was not the Hillary that had appeared before Congress decades ago, this was the woman with a spine of steel, who sat there and answered all of their questions. They even tried to assign her the role of the Secretary of Defense when military instructions were given, something which did not come from her. Soon, that too was over. She answered questions of regarding security concerns, even though it was the Congress which denied the State Department’s request for additional funding for security.Score another for Hillary.

Then during the primaries, suddenly, all of the debunked scandals, and conspiracy theories resurfaced and those who hillary-wins-nominationhad been in those cheap seats for years fought back for her. Not through large rallies, but through quietly voting, knowing that all of those lies had not only been proven to be lies, but that Hillary had stood through so much, and that is the Hillary for whom they voted. The survivor.The woman who dared to be different. The woman who had stood up to so many and stood by her husband when the world felt she should do differently.As usual allegations  without explanation and right-wing furor over imagined events and  worn conspiracy theories.

It is no wonder when the email issue arose, that it was felt that she would be held to a different standard, not only because of being a woman, but because the Republicans were in charge. The same Republicans who did and said nothing when Bush and Cheney deleted nearly 22 million emails on a private server. http://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/web-video/missing-white-house-emails                                                             There was no outcry, no investigation.

And no investigation of an administration that had lied to send us to war in Iraq and one in which the vice-president made a handsome profit. To this day – no investigation. Chanting that she should be in jail, even though those same persons chanting can not even cite a crime that she has committed. The American citizens in the cheap seats were watching, and were ignoring the right-wing frenzy fueled by obsession and lies, and which culminated in an unprecedented letter from the Director of the FBI. But those citizens and supporters did not turn on her, they became entrenched in their positions of support and to this moment support her. Why? Because  they remember. They remember each and every issue which either turned out to be nothing, and the strength and loyalty she exuded when she stood by and with her family .They remember that when everyone expected Hillary to cut and run, she stood her ground and showed us that strength has nothing to do with gender. Yes, a spine of steel that makes Putin tremble because he recognizes that Hillary is not the one who will put up with his crap or anyone’s for that matter. And isn’t that what we want in a leader?

So, when you cast your vote, do so from the same view as those who watched over decades and admired her for her strength and loyalty, for her toughness and for her warrior spirit.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivers a speech "Frontlines and Frontiers: Making Human Rights a Human Reality" at Dublin City University in Ireland December 6, 2012.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque (IRELAND - Tags: POLITICS SOCIETY)

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivers a speech “Frontlines and Frontiers: Making Human Rights a Human Reality” Ireland December 6, 2012.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bill-hillary-clinton-republicans-benghazi_us_560c8493e4b0af3706df90ec

http://mediamatters.org/research/2013/07/30/fox-turns-to-20-year-old-debunked-conspiracy-th/195136

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/giving-hillary-credit-for-schip/

http://addictinginfo.org/2015/04/13/heres-a-list-of-hillary-clintons-accomplishments-so-quit-saying-she-doesnt-have-any/

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Opinion, Politics, Radar Opinion